I'm sorry for the confusion: we do have public network = cluster network = 2a0a:e5c0::/64. They are as usual LACP'ed bonded 10 Gbit/s links. Stefan Kooman <stefan@xxxxxx> writes: > On 8/29/22 00:14, Nico Schottelius wrote: >> Good morning, >> we are trying to migrate a Ceph/Nautilus cluster >> into kubernetes/rook/pacific [0]. Due to limitations in kubernetes we >> probably need to change the cluster network range, which is currently >> set to 2a0a:e5c0::/64. > > I'm curious: why do you use a cluster-network? Would a single public > network not make things easier? Do you use separate network links for > each network? > > Gr. Stefan -- Sustainable and modern Infrastructures by ungleich.ch _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |