Re: something wrong with my monitor database ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 13/06/2022 à 18:37, Stefan Kooman a écrit :
CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

On 6/13/22 18:21, Eric Le Lay wrote:


Those objects are deleted but have snapshots, even if the pool itself
doesn't have snapshots.
What could cause that?


root@hpc1a:~# rados -p storage stat
rbd_data.5b423b48a4643f.000000000006a4e5
  error stat-ing storage/rbd_data.5b423b48a4643f.000000000006a4e5: (2)
No such file or directory
root@hpc1a:~# rados -p storage lssnap
0 snaps
root@hpc1a:~# rados -p storage listsnaps
rbd_data.5b423b48a4643f.000000000006a4e5
rbd_data.5b423b48a4643f.000000000006a4e5:
cloneid    snaps    size    overlap
1160    1160    4194304
[1048576~32768,1097728~16384,1228800~16384,1409024~16384,1441792~16384,1572864~16384,1720320~16384,1900544~16384,2310144~16384]

1364    1364    4194304    []

Do the OSDs still need to trim the snapshots? Does data usage decline
over time?

Gr. Stefan


thanks Stefan for your time!

Snaptrims were re-enabled a week ago but the OSDs only snaptrim newly deleted snapshots.
restarting or outing an OSD doesn't trigger them either.

Crush-reweighting to 0 an OSD indeeds results in more storage being used!

I'll drop the cluster and start again from scratch.

Best,
Eric

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux