Re: The last 15 'degraded' items take as many hours as the first 15K?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is this on SSD or HDD? RGW index, RBD, or ...? Those all change the
math on single-object recovery time.

Having said that...if the object is not huge and is not RGW index
omap, that slow of a single-object recovery would have me checking
whether I have a bad disk that's presenting itself as significantly
underperforming.

Josh

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 4:03 PM Harry G. Coin <hgcoin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Might someone explain why the count of degraded items can drop
> thousands, sometimes tens of thousands in the same number of hours it
> takes to go from 10 to 0?  For example, when an OSD or a host with a few
> OSD's goes offline for a while, reboots.
>
> Sitting at one complete and entire degraded object out of millions for
> longer than it took to write this post.
>
> Seems the fewer the number of degraded objects, the less interested the
> cluster is in fixing it!
>
> HC
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux