“A role always provides access to resources in the tenant in which it is created.” – This is the secret sauce ingredient I was missing. Thanks for taking the time out to respond. The big point that I was not seeing, because of tunnel visions, is that mostly all of the STS resources: oidc providers, roles, policies are tenant specific and need to be created in the tenant namespace. Once I did this then things are working as I want in this area. Right now I am not using session tags for permissioning but it is something that I may look at if I need finer grade controls. -- Mark Selby Sr Linux Administrator, The Voleon Group mselby@xxxxxxxxxx This email is subject to important conditions and disclosures that are listed on this web page: https://voleon.com/disclaimer/. From: Pritha Srivastava <prsrivas@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tuesday, March 8, 2022 at 8:25 PM To: Mark Selby <mselby@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "ceph-users@xxxxxxx" <ceph-users@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: RGW STS AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity Multi-Tenancy Hi Mark, On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 6:57 AM Mark Selby <mselby@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: I am not sure that what I would like to do is even possible. I was hoping there is someone out there who could chime in on this. We use Ceph RBD and Ceph FS somewhat extensively and are starting on our RGW journey. We have a couple of different groups that would like to be their own tenants and have a namespace to themselves. They would also like to use STS and our internal iDP for short lived credentials. We have working POC in the most simple manner using RGW and STS with AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity. With the Role and Policy shown below I create a bucket and end up with the default ownership and ACL as also shown below. Ceph RGW ends up creating the user "$oidc$cc1cfa5f-b3b2-4370-b80b-7d9492d52dfc" as a map to my iDP user which lives in the default no name tenant. All buckets created by this user end up in the default no name tenant. What I really want to do is assign these “dynamic” users to tenants based on Roles/Policies such that I can use iDP aud/sub/azp fields for the assignment. A role always provides access to resources in the tenant in which it is created. So if you want to have (shadow/dynamic) users in different tenants, then you will have to create roles in different tenants. Additionally you will also have to create openid connect providers in each tenant (since in AWS an OIDC provider belongs to an account and in RGW a tenant roughly maps to an account.). And then you can have a role trust policy for every role that will allow a user to assume the role based on its aud/azp/sub field. Is there any way using STS and AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity to assign users to tenants or I am stuck with the default tenant. Could it be that I am simply not correct Policy statements to attach the users to the correct tenanacy. I have done a through web search and cannot find any/many examples of people trying to use this paradigm Thanks! # # Ownership # { "Buckets": [ { "Name": "mybuck", "CreationDate": "2022-02-15T20:30:32.855000+00:00" } ], "Owner": { "DisplayName": "", "ID": "$oidc$cc1cfa5f-b3b2-4370-b80b-7d9492d52dfc" } } # # ACL # { "Owner": { "ID": "$oidc$cc1cfa5f-b3b2-4370-b80b-7d9492d52dfc" }, "Grants": [ { "Grantee": { "ID": "$oidc$cc1cfa5f-b3b2-4370-b80b-7d9492d52dfc", "Type": "CanonicalUser" }, "Permission": "FULL_CONTROL" } ] } # # Role # { "Version" :"2012-10-17", "Statement": [ { "Effect": "Allow", "Principal": { "Federated": [ "arn:aws:iam:::oidc-provider/keycloak.acmewidgets.net:8443/auth/realms/acme" ] }, "Action": [ "sts:AssumeRoleWithWebIdentity" ], "Condition": { "StringEquals": { "keycloak.acmewidgets.net:8443/auth/realms/acme:app_id":"app001" } } } ] } # # Policy # { "Version": "2012-10-17", "Statement": { "Effect": "Allow", "Action": "s3:*", "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::*" } } -- Mark Selby Sr Linux Administrator, The Voleon Group mselby@xxxxxxxxxx This email is subject to important conditions and disclosures that are listed on this web page: https://voleon.com/disclaimer/. Thanks, Pritha _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
