Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We use it without major issues, at this point. There are still flaws, but
there are flaws in almost any deployment and management system, and this is
not unique to cephadm. I agree with the general sentiment that you need to
have some knowledge about containers, however. I don't think that's
necessarily out of place with 2022, either. This most certainly has some
upsides that (for us) offset the downsides in additional
knowledge/complexity. We've significantly benefited from the ease of
containerized deployments when dealing with debugging OSDs with custom
containers without disturbing others on the same host, for example.

There's a huge thread with all the discussion concerning containers if you
search the archives; there's no point in repeating it again.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 10:17 PM norman.kern <norman.kern@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dear Ceph folks,
>
> Anyone is using cephadm in product(Version: Pacific)? I found several bugs
> on it and
> I really doubt it.
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux