Cephadm is stable or not in product?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
From: "norman.kern" <norman.kern@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 12:16:40 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.6.1

Dear Ceph folks,

Anyone is using cephadm in product(Version: Pacific)？ I found several bugs on it and
I really doubt it.

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
  - From: David Orman
- Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
  - From: Jay See
- Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
  - From: Zakhar Kirpichenko
- Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
  - From: Martin Verges

Prev by Date: octopus (15.2.16) OSDs crash or don't answer heathbeats (and get marked as down)
Next by Date: Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
Previous by thread: octopus (15.2.16) OSDs crash or don't answer heathbeats (and get marked as down)
Next by thread: Re: Cephadm is stable or not in product?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux