Re: have buckets with low number of shards

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Josh

Thanks for your response. Do you have any advice how to reshard these big
buckets so it doesn't cause any down time in our cluster? Resharding these
buckets makes a lots of slow ops in deleting old shard phase and the
cluster can't responde to any requests till resharding is completely done.

Regards,
Mahnoosh

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021, 5:28 PM Josh Baergen <jbaergen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Hey Mahnoosh,
>
> > Running cluster in octopus 15.2.12 . We have a big bucket with about 800M
> > objects and resharding this bucket makes many slow ops in our bucket
> index
> > osds. I wanna know what happens if I don't reshard this bucket any more?
> > How does it affect the performance? The performance problem would be only
> > for that bucket or it affects the entire bucket index pool?
>
> Unfortunately, if you don't reshard the bucket, it's likely that
> you'll see widespread index pool performance and stability issues,
> generally manifesting as one or more OSDs becoming very busy to the
> point of holding up traffic for multiple buckets or even flapping (the
> OSD briefly gets marked down), leading to recovery. Recovering large
> index shards can itself cause issues like this to occur. Although the
> official recommendation, IIRC, is 100K objects per index shard, the
> exact objects per shard count at which one starts to experience these
> sorts of issues highly depends on the hardware involved and user
> workload.
>
> Josh
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux