Re: Why you might want packages not containers for Ceph deployments

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> > Yeah, generally there is no much enthusiasm about supporting that
> among developers.
> 
> I guess its because none of them is administrating any large production
> installation 

Exactly!

> The actual implied upgrade period is every 2 years and every
> 4 years as an exception. For storage this is extremely fast, 

I am really surprised about the need to even having to mention this here. I am even wondering if the current 'development path' is able to keep binding organizations like CERN to use ceph with >3000 hdds.


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux