no, disks utilization is around 86%. What is safe value for min_size in this case? 18. 10. 2021 15:46:44 Eugen Block <eblock@xxxxxx>: > Hi, > > min_size = k is not the safest option, it should be only used in case of disaster recovery. But in this case it's not related to IO interruption, it seems. Are some disks utilized around 100% (iostat) when this happens? > > > Zitat von Denis Polom <denispolom@xxxxxxxxx>: > >> Hi, >> >> it's >> >> min_size: 10 >> >> >> On 10/18/21 14:43, Eugen Block wrote: >>> What is your min_size for the affected pool? >>> >>> >>> Zitat von Denis Polom <denispolom@xxxxxxxxx>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have 18 OSD nodes in this cluster. And it does happen even if one OSD daemon goes down or flaps. >>>> >>>> Running >>>> >>>> ceph version 15.2.14 (cd3bb7e87a2f62c1b862ff3fd8b1eec13391a5be) octopus (stable) >>>> >>>> thx! >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/18/21 12:12, Eugen Block wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> with this EC setup your pool min_size would be 11 (k+1), so in case one host goes down (or several OSDs fail on this host), your clients should not be affected. But as soon as a second host fails you’ll notice IO pause until at least one host has recovered. Do you have more than 12 hosts in this cluster so it could recover one host failure? >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Eugen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Zitat von Denis Polom <denispolom@xxxxxxxxx>: >>>>> >>>>>> … >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>> > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |