Hello Janne,
thank you very much for answering my questions.
Rainer
Am 27.08.21 um 12:51 schrieb Janne Johansson:
Den fre 27 aug. 2021 kl 12:43 skrev Rainer Krienke <krienke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hello,
recently I thought about erasure coding and how to set k+m in a useful
way also taking into account the number of hosts available for ceph. Say
I would have this setup:
The cluster has 6 hosts and I want to allow two *hosts* to fail without
loosing data. So I might choose k+m as 4+2 with redundancy at host
level, but isn't this a little unwise?
....
--
Rainer Krienke, Uni Koblenz, Rechenzentrum, A22, Universitaetsstrasse 1
56070 Koblenz, Web: http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~krienke, Tel: +49261287 1312
PGP: http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~krienke/mypgp.html, Fax: +49261287
1001312
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
