Hi,
1. In my cluster I have three monitors; when one monitor is down (I
simply shut down) raising a ceph -s underline that there are two
monitors alive and one down; when 2/3 of monitors down the cluster
became unresponsive (ceph -s remains stuck); is this normal?
yes, this is expected. Your cluster is only responsive if your MONs
can form a quorum, so 2/3 should be online (3/5 etc.)
2. In the ceph website I've read to install one manager for each
monitor; however I've found instructions to install just the first
manager on first monitor; can I follow the same procedure to install
the additional managers or a different procedure (like the one
followed for the additional monitors) is required?
The same you did with the MONs applies to the MGRs, the procedure is
the same for every additional daemon you deploy.
3. Running CentOS I disabled firewalld and selinux; considering the
production cluster behind a perimeter firewall and not queried
directed by clients but through an API, your ideas about this choice
is welcome;
It's a common deployment to have gateways for your clients, e.g. the
rados-gateway for the S3 protocol or an iSCSI gateway for RBD.
Regards,
Eugen
Zitat von "Francesco Piraneo G." <fpiraneo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi all,
finally my (test) cluster is up and running!
Thank you very much for all the people here in list that helped me.
I now have some final questions:
1. In my cluster I have three monitors; when one monitor is down (I
simply shut down) raising a ceph -s underline that there are two
monitors alive and one down; when 2/3 of monitors down the cluster
became unresponsive (ceph -s remains stuck); is this normal?
2. In the ceph website I've read to install one manager for each
monitor; however I've found instructions to install just the first
manager on first monitor; can I follow the same procedure to install
the additional managers or a different procedure (like the one
followed for the additional monitors) is required?
3. Running CentOS I disabled firewalld and selinux; considering the
production cluster behind a perimeter firewall and not queried
directed by clients but through an API, your ideas about this choice
is welcome;
4. Any experience to share about running ceph on debian instead of
centos / rhel is also welcome.
I point to share my work and any opinion will be appreciated.
Francesco
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx