Re: performance between ceph-osd and crimson-osd

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Can you run it with 4k block size , 1 thread. ( Default is 4M and 16 threads)

$ rados bench -p rbd 10 write -b 4096 -t 1 --no-cleanup


On 19/08/2021 04:22, 신희원 / 학생 / 컴퓨터공학부 wrote:
Hi,

I measured the performance of ceph-osd and crimson-osd with same single
core affinity.
I checked IOPS, Latency by rados-bench write , and crimson-osd has lower
performance than ceph-osd about 3 times. (ceph-osd(BlueStore): 228 IOPS,
crimson-osd(AlienStore): 73 IOPS)
-> " $ rados bench -p rbd 10 write --no-cleanup "

Then, crimson-osd's CPU utilization is almost 100%.
I think this is the reason of performance degradation..

Crimson-osd is known for lower CPU consumption than ceph-osd.
I wonder why crimson-osd has more CPU usage in this experiment.

Please let me know how to fix it,

Shin
ᐧ
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux