I thought that too, but for the orphan objects handling you diff the lists from rados ls and radosgw-admin bucket radoslist. So there mus be some kind of difference. I really need this info to debug a problem we have. Am Fr., 16. Juli 2021 um 20:10 Uhr schrieb Jean-Sebastien Landry <Jean-Sebastien.Landry.6@xxxxxxxxx>: > > My understanding is that radoslist is the same (or "very like") as rados > ls, except that it limit the scope to the given bucket. > > to be confirmed, I don't want to spread false information, but when you > do a > radosgw-admin bucket check --check-objects --fix, > it rebuild the "bi" from the pool level (rados ls), so I'm not sure the > bucketindex is "that" much important, knowing that you can rebuilt it > from the pool. (?) > > > > > On 7/16/21 1:47 PM, Boris Behrens wrote: > > [Externe UL*] > > > > Hi, > > is there a difference between those two? > > I always thought that radosgw-admin radoslist only shows the objects > > that are somehow associated with a bucket. But if the bucketindex is > > broken, would this reflect in the output? > > > > -- > > Die Selbsthilfegruppe "UTF-8-Probleme" trifft sich diesmal abweichend > > im groüen Saal. > > _______________________________________________ > > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > > ________________________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx -- Die Selbsthilfegruppe "UTF-8-Probleme" trifft sich diesmal abweichend im groüen Saal. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |