hi
On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 09:40:36AM +0300, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
What is your object size will be? 70T RAW is such small, I think is better add hardware to your RBD cluster and run object service here
at the beginning the object size will be 50M to 1G but after some time
anything goes
k
Sent from my iPhone
On 8 Jul 2021, at 14:17, gustavo panizzo <gfa+ceph@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello
I have some experience with RBD clusters (for use with KVM/libvirt) but
now I'm building my first cluster to use with RGW.
The RGW cluster size will be around 70T RAW, current RBD cluster(s)
are in similar (or smaller) size. I'll be deploying Octopus
Since most of the tunning is pretty different (big number of PGs,
bluestore_compression_*, bluestore_min_alloc_size_*) I wonder if
makes sense to run both workloads in the same cluster or if it would
be better to have dedicated clusters.
However bigger clusters (AFAIK) are more stable, what is other people doing?
Single cluster for all workloads or a cluster per workload?
thanks!
PS: Asking for the future, what about CepFS? should it share cluster?
--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x27263FA42553615F904A7EBE2A40A2ECB8DAD8D5
OLD GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x27263FA42553615F904A7EBE2A40A2ECB8DAD8D5
OLD GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
