RGW Dedicated clusters vs Shared (RBD, RGW) clusters

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello

I have some experience with RBD clusters (for use with KVM/libvirt) but
now I'm building my first cluster to use with RGW.

The RGW cluster size will be around 70T RAW, current RBD cluster(s)
are in similar (or smaller) size. I'll be deploying Octopus

Since most of the tunning is pretty different (big number of PGs,
bluestore_compression_*, bluestore_min_alloc_size_*) I wonder if
makes sense to run both workloads in the same cluster or if it would
be better to have dedicated clusters.

However bigger clusters (AFAIK) are more stable, what is other people doing?
Single cluster for all workloads or a cluster per workload?

thanks!

PS: Asking for the future, what about CepFS? should it share cluster?


--
IRC: gfa
GPG: 0x27263FA42553615F904A7EBE2A40A2ECB8DAD8D5
OLD GPG: 0x44BB1BA79F6C6333
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux