Which mode is that and where can I set it? This one described in https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/multitenancy/ ? On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 2:24 PM Janne Johansson <icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Den tis 8 juni 2021 kl 12:38 skrev Rok Jaklič <rjaklic@xxxxxxxxx>: > > Hi, > > I try to create buckets through rgw in following order: > > - *bucket1* with *user1* with *access_key1* and *secret_key1* > > - *bucket1* with *user2* with *access_key2* and *secret_key2* > > > > when I try to create a second bucket1 with user2 I get *Error response > code > > BucketAlreadyExists.* > > > > Why? Should not buckets relate only to users? Is this by design and is > > there any particular reason that it follows this concept? > > If you want to use > http(s)://bucketname.domain.name/ to access buckets it certainly helps if > they > are uniquely named, no? > > Apart from that, there is a mode for RGW with tenant/bucketname where > overlapping/duplicate bucket names are possible, but of course you > will not get simple DNS-names for published content in that case. > > -- > May the most significant bit of your life be positive. > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |