Den tis 8 juni 2021 kl 12:38 skrev Rok Jaklič <rjaklic@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hi, > I try to create buckets through rgw in following order: > - *bucket1* with *user1* with *access_key1* and *secret_key1* > - *bucket1* with *user2* with *access_key2* and *secret_key2* > > when I try to create a second bucket1 with user2 I get *Error response code > BucketAlreadyExists.* > > Why? Should not buckets relate only to users? Is this by design and is > there any particular reason that it follows this concept? If you want to use http(s)://bucketname.domain.name/ to access buckets it certainly helps if they are uniquely named, no? Apart from that, there is a mode for RGW with tenant/bucketname where overlapping/duplicate bucket names are possible, but of course you will not get simple DNS-names for published content in that case. -- May the most significant bit of your life be positive. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |