Re: Failure Domain = NVMe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Don't forget if you have server failure you might loose many objects. If the failure domain is osd, it means let's say you have 12 drives in each server, 8+2 EC in an unlucky situation can be located in 1 server also.

Istvan Szabo
Senior Infrastructure Engineer
---------------------------------------------------
Agoda Services Co., Ltd.
e: istvan.szabo@xxxxxxxxx
---------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Hall <kdhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 11:42 PM
To: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
Subject:  Failure Domain = NVMe?

Email received from outside the company. If in doubt don't click links nor open attachments!
________________________________

Hello,

In some documentation I was reading last night about laying out OSDs, it was suggested that if more that one OSD uses the same NVMe drive, the failure-domain should probably be set to node. However, for a small cluster the inclination is to use EC-pools and failure-domain = OSD.

I was wondering if there is a middle ground - could we define failure-domain = NVMe?  I think the map would need to be defined manually in the same way that failure-domain = rack requires information about which nodes are in each rack.

Example:  My latest OSD nodes have 8 HDDs and 3 U.2 NVMe.  I'd set up the WAL/DB for with HDDs per OSD  (wasted space on the 3rd NVMe).
Across all my OSD nodes I will have 8 HDDs and either 2 or 3 NVMe
devices per node - 15 total NVMe devices.   My preferred EC-pool profile
is 8+2.  It seems that this profile could be safely dispersed across 15 failure domains, resulting in protection against NVMe failure.

Please let me know if this is worth pursuing.

Thanks.

-Dave

--
Dave Hall
Binghamton University
kdhall@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
607-760-2328 (Cell)
607-777-4641 (Office)
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

________________________________
This message is confidential and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). It may also be privileged or otherwise protected by copyright or other legal rules. If you have received it by mistake please let us know by reply email and delete it from your system. It is prohibited to copy this message or disclose its content to anyone. Any confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost by any mistaken delivery or unauthorized disclosure of the message. All messages sent to and from Agoda may be monitored to ensure compliance with company policies, to protect the company's interests and to remove potential malware. Electronic messages may be intercepted, amended, lost or deleted, or contain viruses.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux