I'm not sure that the tenant solution is what the OP wants - my reading
is that running under a different tenant allows you have different
tenants use the same bucket and user names but still be distinct, which
wasn't what I thought was meant.
You can however get RGW to accept a list of host names regardless of
domain. Assuming you are using the default zone (adjust if otherwise):
Extract the default zonegroup settings:
radosgw-admin zonegroup get > zg-default
Edit zg-default looking for "hostnames" and adjust to be a list of the
required ones (short and/or FQDN according to what the clients use).
Then install the updated settings:
radosgw-admin zonegroup set --infile zg-default
and restart all the RGW instances.
We do this when fronting RGW with HAProxy, to include the individual
hostnames used by the HAProxy backend.
Regards, Chris
On 22/02/2021 14:29, Freddy Andersen wrote:
You need to enable users with tenants … https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/multitenancy/
From: Simon Pierre DESROSIERS <simonpierre.desrosiers@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Monday, February 22, 2021 at 7:27 AM
To: ceph-users@xxxxxxx <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
Subject: multiple-domain for S3 on rgws with same ceph backend on one zone
Hello,
We have functional ceph swarm with a pair of S3 rgw in front that uses
A.B.C.D domain to be accessed.
Now a new client asks to have access using the domain : E.C.D, but to
already existing buckets. This is not a scenario discussed in the docs.
Apparently, looking at the code and by trying it, rgw does not support
multiple domains for the variable rgw_dns_name.
But reading through parts of the code, I am no dev, and my c++ is 25 years
rusty, I get the impression that maybe we could just add a second pair of
rgw S3 servers that would give service to the same buckets, but using a
different domain.
Am I wrong ? Let's say this works, is this an unconscious behaviour that
the ceph team would remove down the road ?
Is there another solution that I might have missed ? We do not have
multi-zone and there are no plans for it. And Cname (rgw_resolve_cname)
seems to only be of use when using static sites (again, from my poor code
reading abilities).
Thank you
--
**AVERTISSEMENT** : Ce courriel et les pièces qui y sont jointes sont
destinés exclusivement au(x) destinataire(s) mentionné(s) ci-dessus et
peuvent contenir de l’information privilégiée ou confidentielle. Si vous
avez reçu ce courriel par erreur, ou s’il ne vous est pas destiné, veuillez
le mentionner immédiatement à l’expéditeur et effacer ce courriel ainsi que
les pièces jointes, le cas échéant. La copie ou la redistribution non
autorisée de ce courriel peut être illégale. Le contenu de ce courriel ne
peut être interprété qu’en conformité avec les lois et règlements qui
régissent les pouvoirs des diverses instances décisionnelles compétentes de
la Ville de Montréal.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
