Re: How OSD encryption affects latency/iops on NVMe, SSD and HDD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 26, 2020 at 04:50:34PM +0000, tri@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> For those who use encryption on your OSDs, what effect do you see on
> your NVMe, SSD and HDD vs non-encrypted OSDs? I tried to find some
> info on this subject but there isn't much detail available.
> 
> >From experience, dmcrypt is CPU-bound and becomes a bottleneck when
> >used on very fast NVMe. Using aes-xts, one can only expect around
> >1600-2000GB/s with 256/512 bit keys.

There's two things to point out as improvements for you.

1. CloudFlare's writeup about reducing latency in dm-crypt earlier this
year:
https://blog.cloudflare.com/speeding-up-linux-disk-encryption/

2. An internal observation, that I don't think was well published yet,
that disabling CONFIG_CRYPTO_STATS may provide significant CPU reduction
(CPU time spent in crypto_stats_* specifically).

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer
E-Mail   : robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux