You can ignore rgw.none details, it dont make sense today from our experience
Still dont know why dev dont cleanup bucket with those rgw.none stats...
Some of our buckets got it others new ones no.
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Janne Johansson <icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx>
Enviado el: martes, 30 de junio de 2020 8:40
Para: Liam Monahan <liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
Asunto: Re: [RGW] Space usage vastly overestimated since Octopus upgrade
Den mån 29 juni 2020 kl 17:27 skrev Liam Monahan <liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> For example, here is a bucket that all of a sudden reports that it has
> 18446744073709551615 objects! The actual count should be around 20,000.
>
> "rgw.none": {
> "size": 0,
> "size_actual": 0,
> "size_utilized": 0,
> "size_kb": 0,
> "size_kb_actual": 0,
> "size_kb_utilized": 0,
> "num_objects": 18446744073709551615
> },
>
That number is a small negative 64bit signed value, printed as an unsigned
64bit integer.
Seems like the counter underflowed.
2^64 = 18446744073709551616
--
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
