Hi Frank, Patrick,
I tried to create a cephfs elsewhere and got the warning, that's what
got my attention. Nothing is broken, but I thought it could have impact
on performance.
Very good to know it's not that bad!
Thanks!!
Kenneth
On 07/05/2020 23:31, Patrick Donnelly wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 5:56 AM Kenneth Waegeman
<kenneth.waegeman@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I read in some release notes it is recommended to have your default data
pool replicated and use erasure coded pools as additional pools through
layouts. We have still a cephfs with +-1PB usage with a EC default pool.
Is there a way to change the default pool or some other kind of
migration without having to recreate the FS?
Not until something like [1] is implemented.
If it's not broken for you, don't fix it.
[1] https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/40285
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
