Re: backfill / recover logic (OSD included as selection criterion)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Wido den Hollander (wido@xxxxxxxx):
> 
> 
> On 1/19/20 12:07 PM, Stefan Kooman wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is there any logic / filtering which PGs to backfill at any given time
> > that takes into account the OSD the PG is living on?
> > 
> > Our cluster is backfilling a complete pool now (512 PGs) and (currently)
> > of the 7 active+remapped+backfilling there are 4 of them on the same
> > OSD. Which stresses this OSD way more than needed. It would be nice if
> > the selection criteria for which PG to backfill (and / or recover) from
> > would include the OSD as selection criterion in order to spread the load
> > across different OSDs.
> > 
> 
> Afaik the OSDs decide this themselves. The primary OSD of a PG will
> negotiate with other OSDs to determine if they can backfill or not.

I found this:
https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/dev/osd_internals/backfill_reservation

> If you set max_backfills to 4 the OSDs will try to use this as much as
> possible.

It was set to "1"

> The MONs do not decide which OSD starts to backfill and which don't.

Check. So this is one of the drawbacks of distributed I guess.

Gr. Stefan

-- 
| BIT BV  https://www.bit.nl/        Kamer van Koophandel 09090351
| GPG: 0xD14839C6                   +31 318 648 688 / info@xxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux