Hi together, I had a look at ceph-fuse code and if I read it correctly, it does indeed not seem to have the relatime behaviour since kernels 2.6.30 implemented. Should I open a ticket on this? Cheers, Oliver Am 02.12.19 um 14:31 schrieb Oliver Freyermuth: > I was thinking about the behaviour of relatime on kernels since 2.6.30 (quoting mount(8)): > -------------------- > "Update inode access times relative to modify or change time. Access time is only updated if the previous access time was earlier than the current modify or change time. (Similar to > noatime, but it doesn't break mutt or other applications that need to know if a file has been read since the last time it was modified.) > > Since Linux 2.6.30, the kernel defaults to the behavior provided by this option (unless noatime was specified), > and the strictatime option is required to obtain traditional semantics. In addition, since > Linux 2.6.30, the file's last access time is always updated if it is more than 1 day old." > --------------------
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
