Re: Unbalanced data distribution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Unbalanced data distribution
From: Thomas Schneider <74cmonty@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 09:58:02 +0200
Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <5f4f4b86-9a80-0f78-fcd2-d254b06854b3@k0ste.ru>
Openpgp: preference=signencrypt
References: <63e7e808-978b-2aba-2501-209de3f7ebd0@k0ste.ru> <C3BC2F23-97F3-45A7-AB0D-9A624D401C2D@dreamsnake.net> <0bb8abdc-bccf-539d-3ed4-07fe40a0fd4a@gmail.com> <eae41cd4-20de-255d-bfbb-a71bd6228328@k0ste.ru> <04545d3a-935f-b734-fcbe-7631f6397ce2@gmail.com> <5f4f4b86-9a80-0f78-fcd2-d254b06854b3@k0ste.ru>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0

OK.

Here's my new pastebin <https://pastebin.com/rF9g2ztC>.


Am 23.10.2019 um 09:50 schrieb Konstantin Shalygin:
> ceph osd crush rule dump
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

References:
- Re: Unbalanced data distribution
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin
- Re: Unbalanced data distribution
  - From: Anthony D'Atri
- Re: Unbalanced data distribution
  - From: Thomas Schneider
- Re: Unbalanced data distribution
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin
- Re: Unbalanced data distribution
  - From: Thomas Schneider
- Re: Unbalanced data distribution
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin

Prev by Date: Re: Unbalanced data distribution
Next by Date: Re: How does IOPS/latency scale for additional OSDs? (Intel S3610 SATA SSD, for block storage use case)
Previous by thread: Re: Unbalanced data distribution
Next by thread: Re: Unbalanced data distribution
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]