Re: require_min_compat_client vs min_compat_client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 16/9/19 18:52, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> 
> On 9/14/19 4:24 AM, Alfred wrote:
>> Hi ceph users,
>>
>>
>> If I understand correctly the "min_compat_client" option in the OSD map
>> was replaced in Luminous with "require_min_compat_client".
>>
>> After upgrading a cluster to Luminous and setting
>> set-require-min-compat-client to jewel, the min_compat_client option
>> still shows as hammer.
> 
> min_compat_client is the oldest version this cluster would be table to
> talk to. The other is the setting you enforce on the cluster.

Great, thank you very much for clarifying that.

Cheers,

> 
> Wido
> 
>> Is that expected and simply a relic or is min_compat_client still having
>> an effect on anything?
>>
>> Your feedback would be very much appreciated.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> _______________________________________________
>> ceph-users mailing list
>> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux