Re: require_min_compat_client vs min_compat_client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/14/19 4:24 AM, Alfred wrote:
> Hi ceph users,
>
>
> If I understand correctly the "min_compat_client" option in the OSD map
> was replaced in Luminous with "require_min_compat_client".
>
> After upgrading a cluster to Luminous and setting
> set-require-min-compat-client to jewel, the min_compat_client option
> still shows as hammer.

min_compat_client is the oldest version this cluster would be table to
talk to. The other is the setting you enforce on the cluster.

Wido

> Is that expected and simply a relic or is min_compat_client still having
> an effect on anything?
>
> Your feedback would be very much appreciated.
>
> Best regards,
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux