Re: Using same name for rgw / beast web front end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Replying to my own question: 

2. Beast is not a web front end, so it would be an apple-to-orange comparison.  I just couldn't find any blogs / docs about it at first (found it here: https://github.com/ceph/Beast)

Still unsure about the first question..

On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:45 PM Eric Choi <echoi@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi there, we have been using ceph for a few years now, it's only now that I've noticed we have been using the same name for all RGW hosts, resulting when you run ceph -s:

rgw: 1 daemon active (..)

despite having more than 10 RGW hosts.

* What are the side effects of doing this? Is this a no-no? I can see the metrics can (ceph daemon ... perf dump) be wrong, are the metrics kept track independently (per host)?

* My second question (maybe this should be a separate email!) is that comparison between Beast vs Civetweb.  We only recently upgraded to Nautilus, so Beast became available as an option to us.  I couldn't find any blogs / docs on comparing these 2 frontends.  Is there any recommended reading or could someone give me an overview?

Much appreciated!



--

Eric Choi
Senior Software Engineer 2 | Core Platform




--

Eric Choi
Senior Software Engineer 2 | Core Platform


_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux