Re: Future of Filestore?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/7/19 8:43 pm, Marc Roos wrote:
>  
> Maybe a bit of topic, just curious what speeds did you get previously? 
> Depending on how you test your native drive of 5400rpm, the performance 
> could be similar. 4k random read of my 7200rpm/5400 rpm results in 
> ~60iops at 260kB/s.

Well, to be honest I never formally tested the performance prior to the
move to Bluestore.  It was working "acceptably" for my needs, thus I
never had a reason to test it.

It was never a speed demon, but it did well enough for my needs.  Had
Filestore on BTRFS remained an option in Ceph v12, I'd have stayed that way.

> I also wonder why filestore could be that much faster, is this not 
> something else? Maybe some dangerous caching method was on?

My understanding is that Bluestore does not benefit from the Linux
kernel filesystem cache.  On paper, Bluestore *should* be faster, but
it's hard to know for sure.

Maybe I should try migrating back to Filestore and see if that improves
things?
-- 
Stuart Longland (aka Redhatter, VK4MSL)

I haven't lost my mind...
  ...it's backed up on a tape somewhere.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux