Re: Erasure Coding performance for IO < stripe_width

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2019-07-08T14:36:31, Maged Mokhtar <mmokhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Maged,

> Maybe not related, but we find with rbd, random 4k write iops start very low
> at first for a new image and then increase over time as we write. If we
> thick provision the image it work does not show this. This happens on random
> small block and not sequential or large. Probably related to initial
> obkect/chunk creation.

I don't see that this is related, we actually see faster performance for
random writes initially. (Unsurprising - writing to a non-existent
part/object means the OSD has nothing else to read, so no overwrite.)

> Also we use the default stripe width, maybe you try a pool with default
> width and see if it is a factor.

This is the default stripe_width for an EC pool with k=2.


-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
"Experience is the name everyone gives to their mistakes." -- Oscar Wilde

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux