Sounds like progress! Thanks for the update! I will see if I can get it working in my test off of the GH site. -Brent -----Original Message----- From: Michael Christie <mchristi@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, June 19, 2019 5:24 PM To: Brent Kennedy <bkennedy@xxxxxxxxxx>; 'Ceph Users' <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: ISCSI Setup On 06/19/2019 12:34 AM, Brent Kennedy wrote: > Recently upgraded a ceph cluster to nautilus 14.2.1 from Luminous, no > issues. One of the reasons for doing so was to take advantage of some > of the new ISCSI updates that were added in Nautilus. I installed > CentOS 7.6 and did all the basic stuff to get the server online. I > then tried to use the > http://docs.ceph.com/docs/nautilus/rbd/iscsi-target-cli/ document and > hit a hard stop. Apparently, the package versions for the required > packages at the top nor the ceph-iscsi exist yet in any repositories. I am in the process of updating the upstream docs (Aaron wrote up the changes to the RHCS docs and I am just converting to the upstream docs and making into patches for a PR, and ceph-ansible (https://github.com/ceph/ceph-ansible/pull/3977) for the transition from ceph-iscsi-cli/config to ceph-iscsi. The upstream GH for ceph-iscsi is here https://github.com/ceph/ceph-iscsi and it is built here: https://shaman.ceph.com/repos/ceph-iscsi/ I think we are just waiting on one last patch for fqdn support from SUSE so we can make a new ceph-iscsi release. > Reminds me of when I first tried to setup RGWs. Is there a hidden > repository somewhere that hosts these required packages? Also, I > found a thread talking about those packages and the instructions being > off, which concerns me. Is there a good tutorial online somewhere? I > saw the ceph-ansible bits, but wasn't sure if that would even work > because of the package issue. I use ansible to deploy machines all > the time. I also wonder if the ISCSI bits are considered production > or Test ( I see RedHat has a bunch of docs talking about using iscsi, > so I would think production ). > > > > Thoughts anyone? > > > > Regards, > > -Brent > > > > Existing Clusters: > > Test: Nautilus 14.2.1 with 3 osd servers, 1 mon/man, 1 gateway ( all > virtual on SSD ) > > US Production(HDD): Nautilus 14.2.1 with 11 osd servers, 3 mons, 4 > gateways behind haproxy LB > > UK Production(HDD): Luminous 12.2.11 with 25 osd servers, 3 mons/man, > 3 gateways behind haproxy LB > > US Production(SSD): Luminous 12.2.11 with 6 osd servers, 3 mons/man, 3 > gateways behind haproxy LB > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |