Re: maximum rebuild speed for erasure coding pool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Den tors 9 maj 2019 kl 16:17 skrev Marc Roos <M.Roos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
 
 > Fancy fast WAL/DB/Journals probably help a lot here, since they do
affect the "iops"
 > you experience from your spin-drive OSDs.

What difference can be expected if you have a 100 iops hdd and you start
using
wal/db/journals on ssd? What would this 100 iops increase to
(estimating)?


I don't know, there is a factor of reading objects which won't get lots of perf from
WAL/DB/Journals at all, only the destination writes, and also the relative sizes of
the WAL/Journals are relevant since they need to be large enough to allow the
drive to flush out data (albeit in a nicer order with larger IOs presumably) or you will
just have nice IOPS for a while and then fall back to spin-drive speeds as the
WAL/Journal gets filled and need to wait for the drives anyhow.

--
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux