On 08.05.19 23:23, Gregory Farnum wrote: > Fixing the wiring wouldn't be that complicated if you can hack on the > code at all, but there are some other issues with the Samba VFS > implementation that have prevented anyone from prioritizing it so far. > (Namely, smb forks for every incoming client connection, which means > every smb client gets a completely independent cephfs client, which is > very inefficient.) Inefficient because of multiplying the local cache efforts or because too much clients stress the MDS? I thought it would be more efficient to run multiple clients (in userspace) that interact in parallel with the Ceph cluster. Instead of having only one mounted filesystem (kernel or FUSE) where all the data passes through. Regards -- Robert Sander Heinlein Support GmbH Schwedter Str. 8/9b, 10119 Berlin https://www.heinlein-support.de Tel: 030 / 405051-43 Fax: 030 / 405051-19 Amtsgericht Berlin-Charlottenburg - HRB 93818 B Geschäftsführer: Peer Heinlein - Sitz: Berlin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
