>From what I understand of your needs, you should create multiple Ceph cluster, and hide them behind a proxy You will have a large cluster, that is the default storage If a customer own their machines, you will have an additional smaller cluster on them The single entry point will default to your cluster, and only targets the smaller cluster for specific buckets That is, indeed, if you use the "path-style" bucket URI, not the DNS-based : in the later case, the appropriate records on the DNS zone will do the job, without any proxy involved On 04/13/2019 06:42 PM, Varun Singh wrote: > Thanks Greg. A followup question. Will Zone, ZoneGroup and Realm come > into picture? While reading the documentation, I inferred that by > setting different Realms, I should be able to achieve the desired > result. Is that incorrect? > > -- > Regards, > Varun Singh > > On Sat, Apr 13, 2019 at 12:50 AM Gregory Farnum <gfarnum@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Yes, you would do this by setting up separate data pools for segregated clients, giving those pools a CRUSH rule placing them on their own servers, and if using S3 assigning the clients to them using either wholly separate instances or perhaps separate zones and the S3 placement options. >> -Greg >> >> On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 3:04 AM Varun Singh <varun.singh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> We have a requirement to build an object storage solution with thin >>> layer of customization on top. This is to be deployed in our own data >>> centre. We will be using the objects stored in this system at various >>> places in our business workflow. The solution should support >>> multi-tenancy. Multiple tenants can come and store their objects in >>> it. However, there is also a requirement that a tenant may want to use >>> their own machines. In that case, their objects should be stored and >>> replicated within their machines. But those machines should still be >>> part of our system. This is because we will still need access to the >>> objects for our business workflows. It's just that their data should >>> not be stored and replicated outside of their systems. Is it something >>> that can be achieved using Ceph? Thanks a lot in advance. >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Varun Singh >> >> >> >>> > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
 |