Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
From: Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 14:09:55 +0700
Cc: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CALaZjRFJaB_FYVXyP6A_2ku2o40XX_m76_nGAvB0TXAUZi-uvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CALaZjRHsfTvos3Smda=uHgnGj3SYYLuCjacm0YrJh8L+z4oBDw@mail.gmail.com> <f4b22265-ded5-d247-e738-2ddacd6cb35d@k0ste.ru> <CALaZjRHXEzrfJpdE=7NhVF6ZaoawfFwdpHoBEvvn3bU-HPpY1w@mail.gmail.com> <eeab612c-2d56-e18e-ef3a-7f5f005a8996@k0ste.ru> <CALaZjREWeaeVT6VHCTfYOFNbJJO8o7-j0DQXiHnTB+yrGTgRQg@mail.gmail.com> <50d67aa9-db38-22c5-7240-cb2a8228c66f@k0ste.ru> <CALaZjRGCcbYmF1BU=P0Y43FDEBhFKmXdW6UbqML-9bf-K1Ahqw@mail.gmail.com> <b75d51f0-7b4e-dd8b-1aa2-f86e0aa6e7c2@k0ste.ru> <CALaZjRFh0YPcuBpEuERkCwotTu1H1dXWx=iMQJehiZ7jj=KxBw@mail.gmail.com> <7ec4c6b9-0be3-c247-6c0b-c9ba13f7e965@k0ste.ru> <CALaZjRFJaB_FYVXyP6A_2ku2o40XX_m76_nGAvB0TXAUZi-uvA@mail.gmail.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.3

On 3/14/19 2:09 PM, Massimo Sgaravatto wrote:

I plan to use upmap after having migrated all my clients to CentOS 7.6


What is your current release?



k

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Massimo Sgaravatto

References:
- weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Massimo Sgaravatto
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Massimo Sgaravatto
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Massimo Sgaravatto
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Massimo Sgaravatto
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Massimo Sgaravatto
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin
- Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
  - From: Massimo Sgaravatto

Prev by Date: Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
Next by Date: Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
Previous by thread: Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
Next by thread: Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]