Re: weight-set defined for some OSDs and not defined for the new installed ones

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, understood, thanks !

So if I try to run the balancer in the current compat mode, should this define the weight-set also for the new OSDs ?
But if I try to create a balancer plan, I get an error [*] (while it worked before adding the new OSDs).



[*]

[root@c-mon-01 balancer]# ceph balancer status
{
    "active": false, 
    "plans": [], 
    "mode": "crush-compat"
}
[root@c-mon-01 balancer]# ceph balancer optimize plan-xyz
Error EINVAL: Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib64/ceph/mgr/balancer/module.py", line 335, in handle_command
    r, detail = self.optimize(plan)
  File "/usr/lib64/ceph/mgr/balancer/module.py", line 659, in optimize
    return self.do_crush_compat(plan)
  File "/usr/lib64/ceph/mgr/balancer/module.py", line 798, in do_crush_compat
    weight = best_ws[osd]
KeyError: (19,)

[root@c-mon-01 balancer]# 


On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 7:34 AM Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/14/19 1:11 PM, Massimo Sgaravatto wrote:
> Thanks
>
> I will try to set the weight-set for the new OSDs
>
> But I am wondering what I did wrong to be in such scenario.

You don't. You just use legacy. But why? Jewel clients? Old kernels?

>
> Is it normal that a new created OSD has no weight-set defined ?

Of course.

> Who is supposed to initially set the weight-set for a OSD ?

Balancer by compat mode.



k

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux