Re: RGW: Reshard index of non-master zones in multi-site

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 10:04, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 09:46, Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Following the update of one secondary site from 12.2.8 to 12.2.11, the
> > following warning have come up.
> >
> > HEALTH_WARN 1 large omap objects
> > LARGE_OMAP_OBJECTS 1 large omap objects
> >     1 large objects found in pool '.rgw.buckets.index'
> >     Search the cluster log for 'Large omap object found' for more details.
> >
>
> [...]
>
> > Is this the reason why resharding hasn't propagated?
> >
>
> Furthermore, infact it looks like the index is broken on the secondaries.
>
> On the master:
>
> # radosgw-admin bi get --bucket=mybucket --object=myobject
> {
>     "type": "plain",
>     "idx": "myobject",
>     "entry": {
>         "name": "myobject",
>         "instance": "",
>         "ver": {
>             "pool": 28,
>             "epoch": 8848
>         },
>         "locator": "",
>         "exists": "true",
>         "meta": {
>             "category": 1,
>             "size": 9200,
>             "mtime": "2018-03-27 21:12:56.612172Z",
>             "etag": "c365c324cda944d2c3b687c0785be735",
>             "owner": "mybucket",
>             "owner_display_name": "Bucket User",
>             "content_type": "application/octet-stream",
>             "accounted_size": 9194,
>             "user_data": ""
>         },
>         "tag": "0ef1a91a-4aee-427e-bdf8-30589abb2d3e.36603989.137292",
>         "flags": 0,
>         "pending_map": [],
>         "versioned_epoch": 0
>     }
> }
>
>
> On the secondaries:
>
> # radosgw-admin bi get --bucket=mybucket --object=myobject
> ERROR: bi_get(): (2) No such file or directory
>
> How does one go about rectifying this mess?
>

Random blog in language I don't understand seems to allude to using
radosgw-admin bi put to restore backed up indexes, but not under what
circumstances you would use such a command.

https://cloud.tencent.com/developer/article/1032854

Would this be safe to run on secondaries?

-- 
Iain Buclaw

*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux