Re: Questions about using existing HW for PoC cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The hope is to be able to provide scale-out storage, that will be performant enough to use as a primary fs-based data store for research data (right now we mount via NFS on our cluster nodes, may do that with Ceph or perhaps do native cephfs access from the cluster nodes.) Right now I’m still in the “I don’t know what I don’t know” stage :)
From: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wjw@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, Jan 28, 2019, 8:11 AM

I'd carefully define the term: "all seems to work well".

I'm running several ZFS instances of equal or bigger size, that are
specifically tuned (buses, ssds, memory and ARC ) to their usage. And
they usually do perform very well.

No if you define "work well" as performance close to what you get out of
your zfs store.... be careful not to compare pears to lemons. You might
need rather beefy HW to get to the ceph-cluster performance at the same
level as your ZFS.

So you'd better define you PoC target with real expectations.

--WjW

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux