Re: mon:failed in thread_name:safe_timer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Well,I used 'systemctl restart ceph-mon@qbs-monitor-online009-hbaz1.service' and 4 MDSs did update to v12.2.9 from 12.2.8. 
The mons'version is v12.2.9.Actually ,the mgr and the OSDs' version is v12.2.9 now. But the mon still failed

What I am confused about is that when I used 'ceph-mds --version' at each MDS ,it returned 'v12.2.9',but when I used 'ceph versions', it seems that I have 5 MDSs, and one's version is 12.2.8.( I only have 4 mds in fact)

Thanks
Loukaiyi

-----Original Message-----
From: Patrick Donnelly [mailto:pdonnell@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2018 2:17 AM
To: 楼锴毅
Cc: Ceph Users
Subject: Re:  mon:failed in thread_name:safe_timer

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:18 PM 楼锴毅 <loukaiyi_sx@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello
> Yesterday I upgraded my cluster to v12.2.9.But the mons still failed 
> for the same reason.And when I run 'ceph versions', it returned "
>     "mds": {
>         "ceph version 12.2.8 (ae699615bac534ea496ee965ac6192cb7e0e07c0) luminous (stable)": 1,
>         "ceph version 12.2.9 (9e300932ef8a8916fb3fda78c58691a6ab0f4217) luminous (stable)": 4
>     },
> "
> But actually I only have four MDS , and their versions are all v12.2.9 .I am confused about it.

How did you restart the MDSs? If you used `ceph mds fail` then the executable version (v12.2.8) will not change.

Also, the monitor failure requires updating the monitor to v12.2.9.
What version is the mons?

--
Patrick Donnelly
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux