On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 12:37:02PM -0400, Ryan Leimenstoll wrote: > I was hoping to get some clarification on what "rgw relaxed s3 bucket > names = false” is intended to filter. Yes, it SHOULD have caught this case, but does not. Are you sure it rejects the uppercase? My test also showed that it did NOT reject the uppercase as intended. This code did used to work, I contributed to the logic and discussion for earlier versions. A related part I wanted was allowing access to existing buckets w/ relaxed names, but disallowing creating of relaxed names. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
