Re: Why rbd rn did not clean used pool?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/26/2018 01:39 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
Why avoid cache tier? Does this only for erasure or for replicated too?

Because cache tier is very uncommon feature. Cepher's was used it to will have rbd writes to EC pools mostly, before Luminous [1]
Why this need for replicated? With cache tier you kill your performance.
If u need something like flash cache - direct your ssd/nvme's to solid only pool and put it ahead hdd-rbd (osd still need nvme/ssd for rockdb if u need performance) via bchace/dm-cache inside your vm's.


[1] https://ceph.com/community/new-luminous-erasure-coding-rbd-cephfs/




k
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux