Re: Why rbd rn did not clean used pool?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Why avoid cache tier? Does this only for erasure or for replicated too?

вс, 26 Авг 2018, 7:42 Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@xxxxxxxx>:
> Configuration:
> rbd - erasure pool
> rbdtier - tier pool for rbd
>
> ceph osd tier add-cache rbd rbdtier 549755813888
> ceph osd tier cache-mode rbdtier writeback
>
> Create new rbd block device:
> rbd create --size 16G  rbdtest
> rbd feature disable rbdtest object-map fast-diff deep-flatten
> rbd device map rbdtest
>
> And fill in rbd0 by data (dd, fio and like).
>
> Remove rbd block device:
> rbd device unmap rbdtest
> rbd rm rbdtest
>
> And now pool usage look like:
>
> POOLS:
>      NAME        ID     USED        %USED     MAX AVAIL     OBJECTS
>      rbd         9       16 GiB         0           0 B        4094
>      rbdtier     14     104 KiB         0       1.7 TiB        5110


Avoid cache-tier configurations. Write rbd objects to EC pool directly
since luminous clients.



k

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux