Re: krbd vs librbd performance with qemu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> > opts="--randrepeat=1 --ioengine=rbd --direct=1 --numjobs=${numjobs}
> > --gtod_reduce=1 --name=test --pool=${pool} --rbdname=${vol} --invalidate=0
> > --bs=4k --iodepth=64 --time_based --runtime=$time --group_reporting"
> >
> 
> So that "--numjobs" parameter is what I was referring to when I said
> multiple jobs will cause a huge performance it. This causes fio to open the
> same image X images, so with (nearly) each write operation, the
> exclusive-lock is being moved from client-to-client. Instead of multiple
> jobs against the same image, you should use multiple images.

ah, I see, didn't realize thant... thanks a lot for valuable info!

n.




-- 
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 00 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 591 166 214
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799

www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: servis@xxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpRUrEBV7vkX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux