Re: Migrating EC pool to device-class crush rules

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



So mostly I want to confirm that is is safe to change the crush rule for
the EC pool.

Changing crush rules for replicated or ec pool is safe.

One thing is, when I was migrated from multiroot to device-classes I was recreate ec pools and clone images with qemu-img for ec_overwrites feature, so I don't have experience with changing erasure-profiles.

Your old profile doesn't have root value, so this is 'default', new rule will be have 'default' too. So I don't see any disadvantages with this migration.


These are both ec42 but I'm not sure why the old rule has "max size 20"
(perhaps because it was generated a long time ago under hammer?).

Likely.





k

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux