Re: radosgw failover help

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


On 06/20/2018 07:20 PM, David Turner wrote:
We originally used pacemaker to move a VIP between our RGWs, but ultimately
decided to go with an LB in front of them.  With an LB you can utilize both
RGWs while they're up, but the LB will shy away from either if they're down
until the check starts succeeding for that host again.  We do have 2 LBs
with pacemaker, but the LBs are in charge of 3 prod RGW realms and 2
staging realms.  Moving to the LB with pacemaker simplified our setup quite
a bit for HA.

We use a similar setup, but without an extra load balancer host. Pacemaker is deployed on all hosts acting as RGW, together with haproxy as load balancer. haproxy is bound to the VIPs, does active checks on the RGW, and distributes RGW traffic to all of the three RGW servers in our setup. It also takes care for SSL/TLS termination.

With this setup we are also able to use multiple VIPs (e.g. one for external traffic, one for internal traffic), and route them to different haproxy instances if possible.

Regards,
Burkhard
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux