Re: unfound blocks IO or gives IO error?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks.
So I'm going to continue looking for the cause of these IO errors.

-- dan
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 3:22 PM Sergey Malinin <hell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From http://docs.ceph.com/docs/mimic/rados/troubleshooting/troubleshooting-pg/ :
>
> "Now 1 knows that these object exist, but there is no live ceph-osd who has a copy. In this case, IO to those objects will block, and the cluster will hope that the failed node comes back soon; this is assumed to be preferable to returning an IO error to the user."
>
> On 22.06.2018, at 16:16, Dan van der Ster <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Quick question: does an IO with an unfound object result in an IO
> error or should the IO block?
>
> During a jewel to luminous upgrade some PGs passed through a state
> with unfound objects for a few seconds. And this seems to match the
> times when we had a few IO errors on RBD attached volumes.
>
> Wondering what is the correct behaviour here...
>
> Cheers, Dan
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux