Re: Why the change from ceph-disk to ceph-volume and lvm? (and just not stick with direct disk access)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Why the change from ceph-disk to ceph-volume and lvm? (and just not stick with direct disk access)
From: Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2018 18:28:59 +0700
Cc: Nick Fisk <nick@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <007101d3ff11$701f6930$505e3b90$@fisk.me.uk>
References: <007101d3ff11$701f6930$505e3b90$@fisk.me.uk>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0

http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/ceph-volume/simple/

?



Only 'scan' & 'activate'. Not 'create'.



k

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

References:
- Re: Why the change from ceph-disk to ceph-volume and lvm? (and just not stick with direct disk access)
  - From: Nick Fisk

Prev by Date: Re: Why the change from ceph-disk to ceph-volume and lvm? (and just not stick with direct disk access)
Next by Date: Re: Why the change from ceph-disk to ceph-volume and lvm? (and just not stick with direct disk access)
Previous by thread: Re: Why the change from ceph-disk to ceph-volume and lvm? (and just not stick with direct disk access)
Next by thread: Re: Why the change from ceph-disk to ceph-volume and lvm? (and just not stick with direct disk access)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux