On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 4:16 AM, Linh Vu <vul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> On my test Luminous 12.2.4 cluster, with this set (initially so I could use
> upmap in the mgr balancer module):
>
>
> # ceph osd set-require-min-compat-client luminous
>
> # ceph osd dump | grep client
> require_min_compat_client luminous
> min_compat_client jewel
>
> Not quite sure why min_compat_client is still jewel.
>
>
> I have created cephfs on the cluster, and use a mix of fuse and kernel
> clients to test it. The fuse clients are on ceph-fuse 12.2.5 and show up as
> luminous clients.
>
>
> The kernel client (just one mount) either on kernel 4.15.13 or 4.16.13 (the
> latest, just out) is showing up as jewel, seen in `ceph features`:
>
> "client": {
> "group": {
> "features": "0x7010fb86aa42ada",
> "release": "jewel",
> "num": 1
> },
> "group": {
> "features": "0x1ffddff8eea4fffb",
> "release": "luminous",
> "num": 8
> }
> }
>
> I thought I read somewhere here that kernel 4.13+ should have full support
> for Luminous, so I don't know why this is showing up as jewel. I'm also
> surprised that it could mount and write to my cephfs share just fine despite
> that. It also doesn't seem to matter when I run ceph balancer with upmap
> mode despite this client being connected and writing files.
>
>
> I can't see anything in mount.ceph options to specify jewel vs luminous
> either.
>
>
> Is this just a mislabel i.e my kernel client is actually fully Luminous
> supported but showing up as Jewel? Or is the kernel client a bit behind
> still?
All luminous features, including upmap, are supported in 4.13+.
This is just a reporting issue caused by the fact that MSG_ADDR2 (which
came before luminous and isn't a required feature) isn't implemented in
the kernel client yet.
>
>
> Currently we have a mix of ceph-fuse 12.2.5 and kernel client 4.15.13 in our
> production cluster, and I'm looking to set `ceph osd
> set-require-min-compat-client luminous` so I can use ceph balancer with
> upmap mode.
You will need to append --yes-i-really-mean-it as a work around.
Thanks,
Ilya
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
