Re: samba gateway experiences with cephfs ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel and Jake,

On Mon, 21 May 2018 22:46:01 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:

> Hi
> 
> On 05/21/2018 05:38 PM, Jake Grimmett wrote:
> > Unfortunately we have a large number (~200) of Windows and Macs clients
> > which need CIFS/SMB  access to cephfs.  
> 
> we too, which is why we're (partially) exporting cephfs over samba too,
> 1.5y in production now.
> 
> for us, cephfs-over-samba is significantly slower than cephfs directly
> too, but it's not really an issue here (basically, if people use a
> windows client here, they're already on the slow track anyway).
> 
> we had to do two things to get it working reliably though:
> 
> a) disable all locking on samba (otherwise "opportunistic locking" on
> windows clients killed within hours all mds (kraken at that time))

Have you seen this on more recent versions? Please raise a bug if so -
client induced MDS outages would be a pretty serious issue.

If your share path is isolated from non-samba clients (as you mention
below), then allowing clients to cache reads / writes locally via
oplocks / SMB2+ leases should offer a significant performance
improvements.

> b) only allow writes to a specific space on cephfs, reserved to samba
> (with luminous; otherwise, we'd have problems with data consistency on
> cephfs with people writing the same files from linux->cephfs and
> samba->cephfs concurrently). my hunch is that samba caches writes and
> doesn't give them back appropriatly.

If you're sharing a kernel CephFS mount, then the Linux page cache will
be used for Samba share I/O, but Samba will fully abide by client sync
requests if "strict sync = yes" (default in Samba 4.7+).

> > Finally, is the vfs_ceph module for Samba useful? It doesn't seem to be
> > widely available pre-complied for for RHEL derivatives. Can anyone
> > comment on their experiences using vfs_ceph, or point me to a Centos 7.x
> > repo that has it?  
> 
> we use debian, with backported kernel and backported samba, which has
> vfs_ceph pre-compiled. however, we couldn't make vfs_ceph work at all -
> the snapshot patters just don't seem to match/align (and nothing we
> tried seem to work).

vfs_ceph doesn't support snapshots at this stage. I hope to work on this
feature in the near future, so that it's fully integrated with the
Explorer previous versions UI.

Cheers, David
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux