Re: GDPR encryption at rest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 1:22 PM, David Turner <drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The process to create an encrypted bluestore OSD is very simple to make them
> utilize dmcrypt (literally just add --dmcrypt to the exact same command you
> would run normally to create the OSD).  The gotcha is that I had to find the
> option by using --help with ceph-volume from the cli.  I was unable to find
> any reference to it in the ceph docs online.
>
> I'm not sure where I would suggest putting it.  I searched for it through
> googling the terms and didn't find anything.  Hopefully this comes up in
> future searches and is helpful.

You are right, it seems that although we have the details at
http://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/ceph-volume/lvm/encryption/
we didn't actually update the flags in the prepare/activate/create sections.

I will make sure those are updated. Thanks for pointing this out.

>
> [1] ceph-volume --help
> ceph-volume lvm --help
> ceph-volume lvm create --help (ahh, there it is)
>
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:51 AM David Turner <drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> At 'rest' is talking about data on it's own, not being accessed through an
>> application.  Encryption at rest is most commonly done by encrypting the
>> block device with something like dmcrypt.  It's anything that makes having
>> the physical disk useless without being able to decrypt it.  You can also
>> just encrypt a folder with sensitive information which would also be
>> encryption at rest.  Encryption not at rest would be like putting a secure
>> layer between the data and the users that access it, like HTTPS/SSL.
>>
>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:25 AM Alfredo Deza <adeza@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 11:12 AM, David Turner <drakonstein@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I've heard conflicting opinions if GDPR requires data to be encrypted
>>> > at
>>> > rest, but enough of our customers believe that it is that we're looking
>>> > at
>>> > addressing it in our clusters.  I had a couple questions about the
>>> > state of
>>> > encryption in ceph.
>>> >
>>> > 1) My experience with encryption in Ceph is dmcrypt, is this still the
>>> > standard method or is there something new with bluestore?
>>>
>>> Standard, yes.
>>>
>>> > 2) Assuming dmcrypt is still the preferred option, is it fully
>>> > supported/tested in ceph-volume?  There were problems with this when
>>> > ceph-volume was initially released, but I believe those have been
>>> > resolved.
>>>
>>> It is fully supported, but only with LUKS. The initial release of
>>> ceph-volume didn't have dmcrypt support.
>>>
>>> > 3) Any other thoughts about encryption at rest?  I have an upgrade path
>>> > to
>>> > get to encryption (basically the same as getting to bluestore from
>>> > filestore).
>>>
>>> Not sure what you mean by 'rest'. The ceph-volume encryption would
>>> give you the same type of encryption that was provided by ceph-disk
>>> with the only "gotcha" being it is LUKS (plain is not supported for
>>> newly encrypted devices)
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for your comments.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux